Mission DreamsIndia

If you haven’t read the article “Simple math on elections”, please review it before reading any further.

It is well observed that the winning candidate does get around 25% votes from his constituency, rather less than that. While those who did not participate in the electoral process are more than 50%, and more importantly, most of these voters are honest, well educated, intellectuals, peace loving non-violent people who have high moral and ethical values.

Here I would ask a simple question through an example:

Your family is going to attend a party but your child prefers staying alone at home, as your child did not like the dress he or she would be wearing. Your child demands for a good dress or else refuses to join the party.

Could you leave your lovely child alone at home, go to the party and enjoy yourself? Of course not!

You would leave no stone unturned in buying the best dress for your child, bring happiness to him or her and you would feel lot happier in taking your child to the party with you.

Then how could those candidates go to the parliament and form the government, leaving millions of children of nation with alone their issues and problems?

• How could such democracy be perfect which has no concern for the people who did not cast a vote?
• Don’t they have a right to opine?
• Why don’t they have a choice?

If they are given a choice, an absent candidate is the winner. Give it a thought.
(It is asserted here that many issues would be raised and many flaws will be highlighted through the articles which will be published on DreamsIndia, before a series of surveys begins)

By not casting a vote, your protest is silent and similar to the hunger strike of a child, which the parents are not even aware of.

Although, DreamsIndia has gained support of more than 15,000 subscribers in less than 15 days, some people have responded as “This is India; nothing will improve”

Again, I ask a question:

Whose India is this? Whose Nation is this? Is this a responsibility of your neighbor or strangers to fix the problems of your home or family? You quickly take remedial actions to fix your family problems then why such a disregard to your nation? Are you pakistanis and is India not your nation but someone else’s? Think over it!

Apart from your 8 hour duty, you devote most of your time to your family. How much time do you devote to your nation? You must learn that just 30-60 minutes in a week can do a lot and you could build “India of your Dreams”.

Believe in yourselves…
Know your power…
Retain your power…
And exercise your power!
Next Article: Justice to Jessica or Anyone – How does it matter to us?

Mission DreamsIndia Leaps In

Jai Hind Fellow Indians!

DreamsIndia respects all religions, cultures and languages and the means of meeting or greeting someone.

Mission DreamsIndia leaps in with “Jai Hind!”

Salutation to someone we meet, would be nothing else than “Jai Hind”.

When we salute saying “Jai Hind”

• It reminds us of being a dutiful citizen of India
• It nurtures our love for our Nation
• It inspires us to fulfill our duties
• It boosts our morale
• It raises our spirits even higher
• It infuses lots of energy in us
• It strengthens our confidence
• It unites all of us Indians
• It lets us cross the bars of castes, religions and cultures
• It tells us that we all have a mission in life
• It defines a direction for us
• It keeps us from bad deeds
• It makes millions of people of India – One India!

So, the un-stoppable “Mission DreamsIndia” begins with –

Jai Hind!

Ever thought?

Poll ratio is usually below 50%, on an average 45%

Usually in a constituency, there are at least 3 candidates

These 45% votes are shared among at least 3 candidates

The winning candidate, at an estimate gets at most around 25% votes.

The largest political party does not have clear majority, i.e. more than 50% seats, that means aggregate votes the largest party has gained, is only around 12-13%

To form the government, the largest has to negotiate a deal of important ministries, which are offered in exchange of support.

Is our Parliament a “CHAUAPAL” WHERE THEY WOULD PLAY THEIR CARDS, ONLY IN THEIR INTEREST?

Does the government represent people of India?
No.

The only difference it has made is, people use to elect who would beat lashes on them.

THIS IS UNTRUE DEMOCRACY, JUST TO FOOL PEOPLE

Even if the CFSL and investigation reports were to be believed, it at least proves that shooter was either Manu Sharma or some of his friends.

• If there were two cartridges, shot from two weapons, Were there one or two shooters?
• What was the interval between two shots?
• Is it likely that one shooter comes, fires one shot, goes un-noticed. Then the other fires another shot and he too goes un-noticed?
• If there were two persons firing two shots, doesn’t it prove that they were together and had a connection.
  And if both shots were triggered by one person, why did he use two weapons?
• If this is to be believed, then the shooter was the person who stole Manu’s weapon and he was none else than his friend, having enmity with Manu Sharma
  Then what was the shooter’s motive behind destroying the weapons? In that case, at least one of the weapons (Manu’s weapon) would have been seized.
  But as per that theory, both the weapons are missing, then obviously, the weapon was destroyed by Manu himself

The needle of suspicion still points to Manu Sharma and his friends, then how could all accused be acquitted? 

DreamsIndia does not have the detail of trial proceedings, and neither it intends to give a new twist to the case.

It is only argued that why these questions are not raised.

We wonder that these questions may have been argued during trial, then how could it lead to the verdict of acquittal of all accused?

While all these questions have a strong weight, irrespective of the questions: whether Manu had visited Tamarind Court or not, whether the weapons were seized are not. whether his vehicle was seized or not and where the vehicle was seized from.

But at least this could have been proved that the investigation reports were only fabricated to save Manu Sharma and his friends. Why it was said that they were framed by police?

While it was said the police story was concocted, why it was not said the the CFSL report could not be trusted? Why it was not considered that Manu’s story of missing weapon was concocted. Why it was not considered that the stories concocted in a murder case, were more likely to have been concocted to save the accused, rather than saying that the story was concocted to frame the accused?

There is very obvious that the police officers (including some seniors) were involved with the criminals.

Also that, how could just one or two ministers have such a level of influence over the police of the capital of India? There were, obviously more politicians involved in it.